China’s Selective Revisionism and India’s Strategic Response
China’s recent white paper on global governance reflects its ambition to reshape the norms underpinning the international order while presenting itself as a defender of multilateralism. Disruptive U.S. foreign policy and alienation of allies have created space for Beijing to project itself as a responsible great power.
China’s Approach to Global Order
China is not dismantling the post-war international order but selectively revising it to suit its interests. It continues to support institutions such as the UN and WTO for legitimacy, while building parallel platforms like the AIIB, NDB, and SCO to expand influence. This is institutional revisionism—preserving structures while altering their meaning.
Institutional vs Normative Order
The institutional order comprises global bodies like the UN and Bretton Woods institutions. The normative order, however, rests on principles of sovereignty, democracy, human rights, and rule of law. China supports the former but seeks to reshape the latter, advancing initiatives such as the Global Development Initiative (GDI), Global Security Initiative (GSI), and Global Civilization Initiative (GCI) to project itself as a norm-setter.
Normative Ambitions and Contradictions
China’s narratives on development, security, and civilisation often mask contradictions. While it promotes sovereignty and non-interference, its actions in the South China Sea and along India’s borders reveal selective respect for international law. The Belt and Road Initiative blurs the line between partnership and influence, and its rejection of arbitration rulings undermines rule-based mechanisms.
Risks for Global Order
China’s selective revisionism risks hollowing out global institutions by weakening liberal principles. Sovereignty may be diluted when smaller states face pressure, human rights standards weakened through cultural relativism, and rule of law eroded by selective compliance. Civil society freedoms could be constrained under the guise of stability and development.
Implications for India
For India, China’s preferred order is misaligned with its interest in a multipolar, rules-based system. Border tensions highlight the gap between rhetoric and restraint. China’s assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific challenges freedom of navigation, while its development diplomacy competes with India’s outreach to the Global South. India’s normative interests lie in defending sovereignty, openness, and rule of law.
The Way Forward
-
Support Rules-Based Order: India must champion sovereignty, territorial integrity, and peaceful dispute resolution.
-
Maintain Strategic Autonomy: Avoid alignment with either U.S. disruption or Chinese revisionism.
-
Lead the Global South: Offer transparent, sustainable, and sovereignty-respecting development models.
-
Push Institutional Reform: Advocate reforms in the UN, WTO, and financial institutions to reflect contemporary realities.
-
Defend Normative Principles: Uphold equality, democracy, accountability, and open societies while addressing developmental concerns.
-
Strengthen Partnerships: Build ties through QUAD, BRICS, SCO, G20, and bilateral platforms to shape a balanced global order.
Conclusion
China is reshaping the global order from within—preserving institutions but revising their normative foundations. India must engage cautiously with China-led initiatives while defending a rules-based, multipolar order that safeguards sovereignty and long-term strategic interests.