EDITORIALS & ARTICLES

How far is the National Commission for Backward Classes an empowered body? Assess its role in the context of rising demand for backwardness among dominant communities. (UPSC CSE Mains 2022 - Political Science and International Relations, Paper 1)

NCBC – an empowered body

  • 102ndConstitution Amendment Act, 2018 provides constitutional status to the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC).
  • It has the authority to examine complaints and welfare measures regarding socially and educationally backward classes.
  • Previously NCBC was a statutory body under the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.

Enhanced role of NCBC

  • Under the old NCBC Act, the Commission merely has the power to recommend inclusion or exclusion of communities in the OBC list.
  • The new Bill will allow it to look into all matters regarding the welfare and development of backward classes, as well as to investigate complaints.
  • Currently, the Scheduled Castes Commission, which looks into cases of atrocities against Dalits, is also in charge of hearing grievances from OBCs.
  • The amended Bill will give the Commission powers equivalent to that of a civil court.
  • To investigate any matter deeply, NCBC will have the power to “summon and enforce” the presence of any person from any part of India and also examine them. 
  • NCBC can also demand any document, receive evidence on affidavits, obtain any other records from the court or police and also issue a commission for the examination of witnesses and documents.
  • It is aimed at providing justice to the socially and educationally backward sections of the society. 
  • NCBC will address the concerns of the backward classes and bring social equality in society. 
  • NCBC would help the backward classes people fight atrocities against them and ensure quick justice to them. 

Concerns

  • Mere Acts will not do as they did not percolate down to the grassroots level, as recent data showed that only 7 out of 100 teachers in the Central Universities belonged to SC/ST and OBC categories. 
  • OBCs have negligible presence in the Supreme Court and high courts. 
  • Skewed representation of OBCs in various committees, commissions, boards and other different forums of the government. 
  • The recommendations of the commissions are not binding on the government. 
  • Critics argue about the scope of reservation at the time when NITI Aayog is promoting public-private partnership and privatization of public sector undertakings. 
  • The SC/ST commissions have had judicial powers all along. There is a provision that these commissions have to present annual reports to the parliament each year based on the action taken reports (ATR) submitted by each ministry on the recommendations previously made. 
  • But since hardly any ministry has submitted the ATR, the commissions have not presented their annual reports in the last 10 to 15 years. 
  • So, giving the constitutional status to the NCBC is fine but implementation will remain the key

Looking ahead

While giving NCBC constitutional status is a step in the right direction, However, only by giving NCBC a constitutional status will not be enough to improve the socio-economic condition of the OBC community and along with this number of other steps are required which include  

  • Proper representation of backward classes of the deprived sections to join the national mainstream. 
  • The government must make public the findings of the caste census and implement reservation accordingly. 
  • The sub-categorization of OBCs will ensure increased access to benefits such as reservations in educational institutions and government jobs for less dominant OBCs. 
  • Political parties should “rise above vote bank politics and work towards social justice”.
  • Government should launch a separate skill development program for the OBC community. 

 







POSTED ON 12-05-2023 BY ADMIN
Next previous