According to Andre Beteille “Village was not merely a place where people lived. It had a design in which were reflected the basic values of Indian society”. This view is rooted in the belief that villages, being the birthplaces of Indian civilization, have preserved the essence of Indian culture and traditions. This view provided dynamism to the static and self-sufficient image of villages propounded by colonial Indologists like Henry Maine , Metcalfe etc.

Villages as a reflection to Indian civilization values:

• Hoebel has stated that the village and its hamlets represented “India in microcosm”: Each village was a distinct entity, had some individual mores and usages, and possessed a corporate unity. Different castes and communities inhabiting the village were integrated in its economic, social, and ritual pattern by ties of mutual and reciprocal obligations sanctioned and sustained by generally accepted conventions.
• Value of collective orientation:
• Villages often emphasize collective decision-making and a sense of community, which is reflective of broader Indian ideals of consensus, cooperation, and harmony. Notwithstanding the existence of groups and factions inside the settlement, people of the village could, and did face the outside world as an organized, compact whole.
• Village provided an important source of identity to its residents.They attach notions of respect, insult and pride with their village. Insult of one’s village, according to Srinivas, has to be avenged like insult of one’s father, brother and wife. Adrian Mayer termed such solidarity as ‘Village patriotism’.
• Mechanical solidarity based on the village identity: S. C. Dube highlights that village settlement, as a unit of social organization, represented a kind of solidarity which was different from that of the kin, the caste and the class.
• Reflection of traditional hierarchies: Beteille suggests that India’s villages often maintain traditional social hierarchies, including caste and class distinctions. The varna system and jatis, which are integral to India’s social fabric, are more pronounced in rural areas, and these structures have persisted over time.
• Reflection of cultural heritage: S C Dube highlights that villages reflects the ritual  structure including folklore, myths , religious teaching of saints / poets and contacts with persons having knowledge of scripture and popular religious  books , animism, polytheism, and even monotheism also , beliefs , ghosts  , demons , witches, and magic.
• Economic aspects: the agriculture being the culture of Indian civilization is well reflected in daily life of Indian villages. The Jajamani system reflected the economic interdependence of villages people guided by traditional social values like caste.
• The civilization value of justice: the tradition of peasant struggle was major aspect of Indian villages. It is now translated into farmer struggle which also finds it origin and genesis in Indian villages; reflecting the ethos of Indian traditional civilization rooted sin value of justice.

Diversion of Indian villages from traditional civilizational values:                 

• Indian villages are in a state of flux. Change is coming into all the areas in villagers’ live. According to Dipankar Gupta, the Indian village is shrinking as a sociological reality, though; it exists as a spatial unit.
• In the recent years, the spread of communication media has also altered the cultural profile of the villages. Urban and modern values are penetrating villages at a speed never witnessed before.
• After independence, riding on the civic reforms, land reforms and establishment of rule of law, traditional inequalities in village came under great strain in 1950s. With the abolition villages developed a different pattern of relation with the revenue officials. New schemes of Panchayati Raj and Community Development also changed the picture of the traditional Indian village.
• Ashis Nandy, village is no longer a village in itself but a counterpoint to the city, a fantasy village for the city.
• Dipankar Gupta, in a recent article Whither the Indian Village, 2005 has argued that – ‘The twin shackles that once decided matters for India’s villagers, caste and agriculture, no longer exercise their vigorous hold’. This is largely possible because, according to him, agriculture is no longer the mainstay of rural economy and caste no longer the only determinant of social status. Fluidity of occupations, identity politics and so on, has weakened the caste as an institution.

Dasgupta highlights that the village are perceived to maintain historic continuity and stability. Sociological overview of India’s villages suggests that they continue to be representative of the country’s basic civilizational values. They serve as living testaments to the enduring cultural, social, and economic principles that have shaped Indian society for centuries. While adaptation and evolution are evident, the core values persist, making Indian villages a vital and dynamic microcosm of India’s rich cultural heritage and civilizational values, as posited by Andre Beteille.