Regulatory reform stuck in a loop in Health Ministry
Introduction
- Policy Initiatives: The DCGI, under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, announced reforms on three critical issues impacting public health: drug recall guidelines, good distribution practices, and the regulation of similar brand names.
- Objective: These measures are intended to safeguard public health by ensuring the safety and efficacy of drugs, preventing errors in prescription, and improving distribution standards.
Policy Initiatives and Their Importance
- Drug Recall Guidelines:
- Purpose: To swiftly remove drugs failing quality tests from the market to prevent potential harm to patients.
- Significance: Ensures that unsafe or substandard drugs do not reach consumers, thereby protecting public health.
- Good Distribution Practices (GDP):
- Purpose: To regulate the storage and distribution of drugs during transit and sale.
- Significance: Ensures that drugs are stored and handled properly, maintaining their efficacy and safety until they reach the consumer.
- Regulation of Similar Brand Names:
- Purpose: To avoid confusion caused by similar drug names, which can lead to prescription errors and harm to patients.
- Significance: Reduces the risk of medication errors by ensuring that drug names are distinct and not misleading.
Historical Context and Persistent Issues
- 59th Report of the PSC (2012):
- Focus: Evaluated the functioning of the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) and identified issues with drug recall guidelines, drug storage standards, and confusing brand names.
- Historical Flagging:
- Drug Recall Guidelines: Initially flagged by the Drugs Consultative Committee (DCC) in 1976.
- Storage Standards: Identified by the Supreme Court in 1974.
- Brand Name Confusion: Raised by the Court in 2001.
Implementation Challenges
- Non-Binding Nature of Guidelines:
- Current Status: Recent drug recall guidelines (2012, 2017, 2024) announced by the DCGI lack legal enforceability.
- Issue: The DCGI cannot create binding laws; only the Ministry of Health can, resulting in ineffective enforcement.
- Storage Guidelines:
- Proposal History: Proposal to adopt WHO’s GDP guidelines and make them binding was discussed in 2013.
- Challenges: Resistance from stakeholders and anticipated pushback from trade associations due to cost implications of implementing the guidelines.
- Recent Developments: Despite acknowledging the problem, the government has yet to finalize and enforce binding GDP guidelines.
- Brand Name Regulation:
- Existing Rule: Companies are required to self-declare that their brand names are not similar to existing ones.
- Shortcomings: The rule is inadequate as it relies on self-regulation and does not address the issue of misleading or confusing names effectively.
Repeated Delays and Bureaucratic Stagnation
- Drug Recall Guidelines:
- Cycle: Guidelines have been proposed multiple times but lack enforceability due to their non-binding nature.
- Good Distribution Practices:
- Delay Reasons: The proposal to make GDP guidelines legally binding faces delays due to logistical concerns and opposition from trade associations.
- Brand Name Regulation:
- Ineffective Measures: Government responses have included administrative actions rather than substantial reforms, resulting in continued issues with confusing drug names.
Root Causes of Ineffectiveness
- Leadership and Expertise Issues:
- Role of Joint Secretary: The Joint Secretary heading the Drug Regulation Section often lacks domain expertise and institutional knowledge.
- Impact: Frequent changes in leadership and lack of expertise contribute to ineffective policy formulation and implementation.
- Bureaucratic Resistance:
- Stakeholder Pushback: Pharmaceutical and trade associations resist reforms that require additional investments or operational changes.
- Bureaucratic Tactics: The use of repeated consultations and discussions serves to delay action and avoid making binding decisions.
Recommendations for Reform
- Strengthening Legal Framework:
- Drug Recall Guidelines: Should be made legally binding with clear enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance.
- Good Distribution Practices: GDP guidelines need to be mandated as law to ensure proper storage and handling of drugs.
- Brand Name Regulation: Introduce rigorous vetting by the regulator to prevent misleading or confusing drug names.
- Enhanced Regulatory Oversight:
- Regulatory Empowerment: DCGI and other regulatory bodies should have the authority and resources to enforce compliance and prevent violations.
- Direct Intervention:
- Prime Minister’s Office: To break the cycle of inaction, higher-level intervention from the Prime Minister’s Office may be necessary to ensure adherence to reforms and overcome bureaucratic resistance.
Next
previous