- Home
- Prelims
- Mains
- Current Affairs
- Study Materials
- Test Series
Latest News
Either Repeal or Revise the Country’s Fiscal Law
FRBM Act 2003
- Mandatory Provision: The FRBM Act made it mandatory for the government to place the following along with the Union Budget documents in Parliament annually:
- Medium Term Fiscal Policy Statement: It lays down the limits on the size of the budget deficits for three years and targets for tax and non-tax receipts.
- Macroeconomic Framework Statement: The macroeconomic framework gives the government’s outlook on growth prospects of the economy.
- Fiscal Policy Strategy Statement: It explains how the current policies follow sound fiscal management principles and give reasoning for any deviation from the deficit targets set by it under the FRBM Act.
- Target for the Government: It sets a target for the Centre’s annual fiscal deficit ratio (FD) at 3% of gross domestic product (GDP).
- The states had to legislate their own FRBM Acts, limiting a state’s FD to 3% of its own GDP.
- Continuing the path of fiscal consolidation, the Government intends to bring the fiscal deficit below 4.5 per cent of GDP by 2025-26.
- Prohibition on Borrowing: The Act prohibits borrowing by the government from the Reserve Bank of India, thereby, making monetary policy independent of fiscal policy.
- The Act bans the purchase of primary issues of the Central Government securities by the RBI after 2006, preventing monetization of government deficit.
Challenges of FRBM Act, 2003
- Reliance on Fixed Numbers: Focusing on a fixed target for the fiscal deficit restricts the government from dealing with dynamic situations typical of market economies.
- The requirement to achieve a fixed target has prevented fiscal policy from being countercyclical when needed.
- Escape Clauses: The FRBM Act has also been criticized because of incorporating imprecisely defined fiscal deficit escape clauses and limited accountability in the event of missed targets.
- Weak Linkage between Policy Setting and Implementation: This has hindered the ability to promptly and clearly adjust to changes in fiscal policy.
- The transparency and accountability framework has not been able to provide sufficient coverage or assessment of fiscal risks.
- Lack of Debt Ceiling Law: India’s fiscal rules are mainly focused on traditional budget balance rules with no debt ceiling law.
- Emerging best practices have moved toward a structural budget balance rule or an expenditure rule.
- Insufficient Assessment of Fiscal Risks: There was no attempt to assess the potential fiscal risks.
- For example: The impact of the announcement of the Pay Commission, the increase in commodity prices and the implications on fiscal policy, the implications of off-budget items such as contingent liabilities.
Suggestions
- Need for flexible fiscal policies, combining public and private spending.
- The arbitrary limits on budget deficits might not be the most effective approach.
Time for Clearly defined Escape Clauses and Strengthening the enforcement of Fiscal Rules by
- The establishment of independent fiscal councils
- Full-fledged fiscal stability reporting, addressing the coverage of off-budget items like contingent liabilities
- Improving linkages between fiscal policy and budget processes
- Sharing of responsibilities and coordination within tiers of government for stabilization and sustainability
- Introducing state credit ratings for measuring fiscal performance
FRBM Review committee recommended · The Committee headed by former Revenue Secretary, NK Singh was appointed by the government to review the implementation of FRBM. · The committee suggested using debt as the primary target for fiscal policy and that the target must be achieved by 2023. · Fiscal Council: The committee proposed to create an autonomous Fiscal Council with a chairperson and two members appointed by the Centre (not employees of the government at the time of appointment) · Deviations: The committee suggested that the grounds for the government to deviate from the FRBM Act targets should be clearly specified. · Borrowings: According to the suggestions of the committee, the government must not borrow from the RBI, except when: o The Centre has to meet a temporary shortfall in receipts o RBI subscribes to government securities to finance any deviations o RBI purchases government securities from the secondary market |
It’s time to update the fiscal rules to be more flexible and coordinated, ensuring a balance between discipline and adaptability in managing the country’s budget.