|
Controversy Over ISFR 2023: Forest Rights Act (FRA) and Forest Cover Loss
Background:
The India State of Forest Report (ISFR) 2023, published by the Forest Survey of India, attributed part of the "negative" change in forest and tree cover to the implementation of the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006. This assertion has sparked a strong response from the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which has questioned the scientific basis of the claim and expressed concern over its potential impact on the execution of the FRA.
Findings of ISFR 2023
- The 18th biennial ISFR assessment reveals a significant decline in dense natural forests across India.
- Within the Recorded Forest Area (RFA):
- Loss of over 1,200 sq km of Mid-Dense Forest (MDF).
- Loss of a similar area in Open Forest (OF).
- However, there was an increase of over 2,400 sq km in Very Dense Forest (VDF).
- Outside RFA:
- Around 64 sq km loss of Dense Forest.
- Over 416 sq km loss of Mid-Dense Forest.
- The report cites the following reasons for forest cover decline in both RFA and non-RFA areas:
- Human encroachments
- Natural disasters such as storms, floods, and landslides
- Harvesting of short rotation plantations or other logging activities
- Titles granted to beneficiaries under the Forest Rights Act (2006)
The Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006
- Official name: The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.
- Objective:
To recognize and grant forest rights to Forest Dwelling Scheduled Tribes (FDST) and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFD) who have lived in forest areas for generations, thereby addressing historical injustices and ensuring their livelihoods.
- Eligibility:
Rights can be claimed by individuals or communities who have lived in forests for at least three generations (75 years) before 13 December 2005.
- Conservation Clause: Critical wildlife habitats within national parks and sanctuaries are to remain inviolate for wildlife conservation.
- Authorities Involved:
- Gram Sabha: Initiates the determination of individual or community forest rights.
- Sub-divisional Level Committee: Examines gram sabha resolutions.
- District Level Committee: Grants final approval for forest rights.
Points of Contention
- ISFR 2023’s claim: For the first time, FRA has been explicitly blamed for forest cover loss.
- Ministry of Tribal Affairs’ rebuttal:
- The report lacks scientific evidence and proper “ground truthing.”
- The claim could reinforce administrative biases against the implementation of FRA.
- FRA only recognizes pre-existing rights and does not legalize fresh encroachments.
- The Act does not create new rights that harm ecological balance.
Responses from Civil Society and Official Clarifications
- Civil society reaction: More than 150 organizations wrote to the government condemning the ISFR’s claim. They accused the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) of undermining FRA through unsubstantiated conclusions.
- Environment Ministry’s clarification: ISFR 2023 also showed a substantial increase in forest cover, reflecting community-led conservation efforts.
The Ministry dismissed the civil society’s interpretations as “devoid of merit.”
Conclusion
This controversy highlights the complex interplay between environmental conservation and tribal rights. It stresses the need for rigorous scientific evidence before making policy assertions that could impact forest governance and tribal livelihoods. The debate underscores the importance of evidence-based policymaking and better coordination between ministries to ensure sustainable forest management while safeguarding tribal rights under the FRA.
|
|
Promise and Pitfalls of India’s ₹99,446 Crore Employment-Linked Incentive (ELI) Scheme:
Overview of the Employment-Linked Incentive (ELI) Scheme
- Approval and Budget: The Union Cabinet has approved the ELI scheme with a budget of ₹99,446 crore, announced in the 2024–25 Union Budget.
- Objective:
To boost job creation, particularly in the manufacturing sector, as part of the Prime Minister’s five-scheme employment package (which also includes internships and youth skill development).
- Implementation Period: August 1, 2025 – July 31, 2027.
- Implementing Agency: Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO).
- Target: Create over 3.5 crore jobs within two years, benefiting approximately 1.92 crore newly employed individuals.
Key Provisions
Employee Benefits
- Eligibility: Salaries up to ₹1 lakh per month.
- Incentive: One-month EPF wage (up to ₹15,000) per eligible employee.
- Disbursal:
- First instalment after 6 months of continuous service.
- Second instalment after 12 months.
- Mode: Direct bank transfer.
- Savings Component: Part of the incentive is deposited into a fixed deposit account, which the employee can withdraw later.
Employer Incentives
- Eligibility: Establishments registered with EPFO.
- Support: Up to ₹3,000 per month for each new employee retained for at least 6 months, provided for two years.
- Manufacturing Firms: Incentives extended to the 3rd and 4th years as well.
Employers’ Response
- Generally positive, calling the scheme a “laudable initiative” encouraging first-time employment and sustained job creation.
- Highlighted potential to boost labour-intensive sectors and transform India’s employment landscape.
- Industry experts suggested:
- Inclusion of micro and small manufacturing units (especially those with fewer than 20 employees).
- Shifting scheme oversight to the Ministry of MSME.
- Using a structured reimbursement model linked to payroll growth.
- Offering a direct monthly subsidy to both employers and employees tied to continuous employment for easier and broader adoption.
Trade Union Response and Concerns
- Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS): Welcomed the scheme but urged expansion of social security and enhancement of job quality.
- Other Central Trade Unions: Criticised the scheme, highlighting risks based on prior experiences.
Major Concerns
- Risk of Fund Misuse: Fear that workers'' savings might be diverted to subsidise employers.
Referenced issues in the 2020 Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme, where benefits went mostly to large firms without substantial job creation.
- Doubts on EPFO’s Role: EPFO’s core mandate is to safeguard employee savings, not create jobs. Questions raised on how EPFO can implement this incentive scheme without specific government funding.
- Call for a Dedicated Body: Growing demand to establish a specialised agency to administer the scheme rather than relying on EPFO, which lacks the required mandate and mechanisms.
Additional Pitfalls and Challenges
- Quality vs Quantity Trade-off: Risk that firms prioritize the number of hires over skill or productivity.
- Short-Term Hiring Spikes: Firms may inflate hiring temporarily just to avail benefits, without a real long-term employment commitment.
- Implementation Challenges: Necessity for robust monitoring and verification systems to avoid misuse or falsification of employment data.
- Sectoral Bias: Likely to favour larger firms with established compliance systems, potentially excluding micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), which employ a majority of workers.
|
|
India Ranks 4th in Global Income Equality – World Bank Report
India Emerges as the Fourth Most Equal Country Globally
- According to the World Bank’s latest estimates, India holds the position of 4th most income-equal country worldwide.
- Gini Index score: 25.5 (lower scores indicate greater equality).
- Only the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, and Belarus have better equality scores.
- This achievement coincides with a significant decline in extreme poverty, dropping from 16.2% (2011-12) to 2.3% (2022-23).
- Over 171 million Indians have been lifted out of extreme poverty in the last decade.
Understanding the Gini Index and India’s Score
- The Gini Index measures income inequality:
- 0 = perfect equality
- 100 = maximum inequality
- India’s score of 25.5 places it in the “moderately low inequality” category.
- For comparison:
- China: 35.7
- United States: 41.8
- G7/G20 averages: significantly higher than India
- India’s score is close to the “low inequality” threshold, outperforming many advanced economies.
Decline in Extreme Poverty: A Key Driver
- Using the global poverty line of USD 2.15/day, India’s extreme poverty rate declined sharply:
- From 16.2% in 2011-12 to 2.3% in 2022-23.
- This reflects one of the largest reductions in poverty globally in recent years.
Government Schemes and Inclusive Policy Interventions
The World Bank credits India’s success to inclusive policies alongside economic growth:
- Financial Inclusion and Direct Transfers:
- PM Jan Dhan Yojana: Over 55 crore bank accounts expanded financial access, especially in rural areas.
- Aadhaar-linked Direct Benefit Transfers (DBT): Improved efficiency and reduced leakages, saving ₹3.48 lakh crore by March 2023.
- Health and Social Security:
- Ayushman Bharat: Provides ₹5 lakh health insurance, with 41 crore beneficiaries.
- PMGKAY: Distributed free food grains to over 80 crore people, enhancing food security.
- Livelihood and Entrepreneurship:
- Stand-Up India: Offers loans and assistance to SC/ST and women entrepreneurs.
- PM Vishwakarma Yojana: Supports traditional artisans with training and market access.
Balancing Growth with Equity
- India’s progress shows a successful blend of economic reforms and social protection.
- According to the Social Welfare Department, the Gini Index score reflects improved access to food, jobs, healthcare, and banking.
- India’s journey is a potential model for other developing countries seeking inclusive growth.
Global Context and India’s Distinctive Approach
- India ranks among 167 countries surveyed.
- Other countries in the “moderately low inequality” group include Scandinavian welfare states (Norway, Finland, Belgium) and fast-growing economies like Poland and the UAE.
- While many countries rely on long-standing welfare systems, India’s success is driven by digital inclusion, targeted cash transfers, and integrated rural support.
- This makes India a unique example of achieving equity within a large and diverse democracy.
|
|
Lessons from the Telangana Blast: Safety, Regulation, and Environmental Impact:
The Telangana Blast Incident
- Event:
A powerful explosion occurred at Sigachi Industries, a pharmaceutical factory in Pashamylaram near Hyderabad, flattening a three-storey building.
- Casualties:
Of the 143 workers present, 39 lost their lives.
- Initial Claims: Sigachi Industries denied that the blast originated from a reactor explosion.
- Investigation: A four-member expert committee led by CSIR-IICT emeritus scientist B. Venkateshwar Rao is investigating the cause.
Context: A Part of a Larger Pattern of Pharma Industry Accidents
- Previous Major Accidents:
- SB Organics, Sangareddy (2024): 6 deaths
- Anakapalli, Andhra Pradesh (Aug 2024): 17 deaths
- Parawada, Andhra Pradesh (June 2025): 2 deaths
Likely Cause of the Telangana Blast
- Initial Theory: Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion (BLEVE), later dismissed.
- Current Hypothesis: Dust explosion caused by airborne microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), a fine wood pulp powder used in pharma manufacturing.
- Dust Explosion Background: Such explosions are well-documented in industries involving fine powders (e.g., flour mills, mining) since as early as 1785 (Turin, Italy).
- Process Involved: The factory processed wood slurry into MCC using spray dryers. The MCC powder is highly combustible when suspended in air.
Regulatory and Safety Lapses Highlighted
- Lack of Proper Signage: Emergency teams arrived without knowledge of hazardous materials due to missing or incomplete environmental display boards.
- Compliance Failure: Both State and Central Pollution Control Boards mandate display of environmental and operational details for guiding disaster response, which Sigachi Industries failed to follow.
- Impact: Delays and complications in firefighting and rescue operations increased risks to lives.
- Need for Robust Framework: Periodic audits and strict enforcement could improve compliance and emergency readiness.
Implications for the Pharmaceutical Sector
- Safety and Brand Trust: Safety lapses erode global trust in India’s pharmaceutical manufacturing.
- Telangana’s Strategic Role:
- Produces 1/3rd of India’s pharmaceuticals
- Accounts for 1/5th of pharma exports
- Responsible for 1/3rd of global vaccine output
- Attracted $1.49 billion in life sciences investments in 4 years
- Home to India’s largest biotech incubator concentration (Hyderabad)
- Challenges for Smaller Firms: Despite global success, many smaller pharma companies face ongoing safety and quality issues, risking the industry’s overall credibility.
U.S. Market and Regulatory Pressure
- Market Dependence: India’s pharma exports are heavily reliant on the U.S. FDA-regulated market.
- Compliance Requirements: Firms must adhere to strict standards under the United States Pharmacopeia-National Formulary.
- Concerns:
Regulatory gaps and cost-cutting have led to unsafe production practices in some Indian firms, raising red flags internationally.
Pollution Control and Environmental Concerns
- Regulatory Weaknesses: Growth in Telangana’s pharma sector driven by permissive zoning and lax enforcement.
- Industrial Encroachment: Industrial zones like IDA Pashamylaram are increasingly surrounded by residential areas, raising public health concerns.
- Environmental Damage: Toxic chemicals and untreated effluents contaminate soil and water.
- Water Pollution: The Musi River ranks 22nd globally for active pharmaceutical ingredient contamination.
- Health Impact: Contamination linked to rising antimicrobial resistance — a serious global health threat demanding urgent regulatory action.
The Way Forward for India’s Pharmaceutical Sector
- Urgency of Reforms: Recent accidents are warning signals requiring a strong, transparent, and enforceable regulatory framework.
- Balancing Growth and Safety: To maintain India’s position as a trusted global pharma supplier, growth must be aligned with strict safety, environmental, and quality standards.
- National Imperative: Regulatory reform is crucial not only for industry success but also for protecting lives, preserving reputation, and ensuring long-term economic resilience.
|
Latest News
General Studies