- Home
- Prelims
- Mains
- Current Affairs
- Study Materials
- Test Series
Latest News
What is meant by conflict of interest? Illustrate with examples, the difference between the actual and potential conflicts of interest. (UPSC IAS Mains 2018 General Studies Paper – 4)
A conflict of interest occurs when an individual’s personal interests – family, friendships, financial, or social factors – could compromise his or her judgment, decisions, or actions in the workplace
Actual Conflict of Interest: An actual conflict of interest arises when an individual’s personal interests directly conflict with their professional duties.
For example:
-
- A government official who holds shares in a company that is bidding for a government contract.
- A doctor who receives a commission from a pharmaceutical company for prescribing their drugs.
- A judge who owns shares in a company that is involved in a case before them.
- A police officer who receives gifts or favors from a suspect they are investigating.
- An auditor who is hired by a company to audit their financial statements, but also provides consulting services to the same company.
Potential Conflict of Interest: A potential conflict of interest arises when an individual’s personal interests could potentially influence their professional duties.
For example:
-
- A financial advisor who receives a commission for recommending certain investment products to clients.
- A journalist who owns shares in a company they are reporting on.
- A lawyer who represents a client whose interests conflict with their own personal beliefs.
- An academic researcher who receives funding from a company that produces a product they are researching.
- A public official who has close personal or financial ties to a company that is seeking a government contract.
In each of these situations, the individual’s personal interests could potentially influence their professional duties, creating a conflict of interest. It is important for professionals to be aware of these potential conflicts and take steps to manage them, such as recusing themselves from decision-making processes, disclosing potential conflicts to relevant parties, or seeking guidance from an ethics committee.