Analyse the changing nature of caste as a status group. (UPSC CSE Mains 2024 - Sociology, Paper 1).
In Max Weber’s phraseology, caste and class are both status groups. While castes are perceived as hereditary groups with a fixed ritual status, social classes are defined in terms of the relations of production. A social class is a category of people who have a similar socio-economic status in relation to other classes in the society. The individuals and families which are classified as part of the same social class have similar life chances, prestige, style of life, attitudes etc. In the caste system, status of a caste is determined not by the economic and the political privileges but by the ritualistic legitimation of authority. In the class system, ritual norms have no importance at all but power and wealth alone determine one’s status.
Weber considered the Indian society an "ideal type" of his general notion of belief systems as main determinants of the social and economic structure (in contrast to the Marxist view). In India the link between religious beliefs and social differentiation was direct and explicit, whereas in western society the connection is indirect and obscure. Hence caste appeared, to Weber, as an integral aspect of Hinduism, and he started out by declaring this central notion quite axiomatically: 'before any things else, without caste there is no Hindu”. Weber then went on to explore the alleged parallel between caste and guild. He concluded that there was much more to caste than mere occupational specialization. For instance, the guilds of the European Middle Ages were not closed, endogamous social units like castes. Therefore, an extensive analogy between caste and guild missed the essential features of both phenomena. This served to corroborate the major point Weber wanted to prove. The formative forces underlying caste are not to be found in economic or material conditions, but in ideology, i.e. religion, in the shape of Hinduism.
Weber construed caste as a special and extreme case of status groups. Whereas a class was considered as being constituted by individuals in similar economic positions, the cohesive force of a status group was honor and prestige. Identity was created and maintained by imposing restrictions on social intercourse and marriage with those who "do not belong", primarily those being inferior in terms of honor and prestige. In the Indian caste system this mechanism was developed to the extreme with strict caste endogamy and the religious concept of pollution. Caste was thus a more perfect variety of closed status of class.
Next
previous
Latest News
EDITORIALS & ARTICLES
General Studies