- Home
- Prelims
- Mains
- Current Affairs
- Study Materials
- Test Series
EDITORIALS & ARTICLES
Indian constitution-makers though had options to choose presidential system but went against it. Explain
India is a parliamentary democracy that follows the Westminster model of governance. Indian political system is widely influenced by British system. The constitution-makers had options to choose presidential system but went against it due to variety of factors.
Features of parliamentary democracy
- Nominal and real head In parliamentary democracy, the head of state and head of government are different. They are the same in presidential system.
- Majority party rule The party that wins more seats in the lower house of parliament forms the government. The president is bound by duty to recognize the government.
- Collective responsibility The government is responsible for the lower house of parliament. If they lose confidence, the government cannot continue.
- Accountability The parliamentary system has more accountability for their actions. The ministers are responsible for the lower house of parliament as well as people.
- Wider representation The parliamentary system allows more diverse group to rule the country through representation in government. In presidential system this looks unlikely.
- Familiarity Indian constitution-makers were familiar with British system as they had been part of it before independence. It was simpler way of electing compared to presidential one.
- Instability Presidential system gives stability for a fixed duration without change in government. The parliamentary government survives only if it has full majority.
- Long chain of commands Decision-making process in parliamentary system has to follow procedure and parliament is the ultimate authority. In presidential system, president has powers to overrule legislature.