AUGUST 2,2026 CURRENT AFFAIRS
BoP Booster: RBI's Swap Scheme Draws Record Forex Inflows
GS III : Economy I External sector
Why in News?
RBI''s concessional swap facility, introduced to boost foreign currency inflows, has attracted $40.82 billion till 31 July 2026, since its launch on 5 June 2026.
Background : Covers three channels: FCNR(B) deposits, OFCB, and ECB inflows
Key Concepts
|
Term
|
Meaning
|
|
FCNR(B)
|
Foreign Currency Non-Resident (Bank) — term deposit by NRIs in foreign currency; shields depositor from exchange rate risk
|
|
ECB
|
External Commercial Borrowings — loans by Indian entities from foreign lenders, regulated under FEMA, 1999
|
|
Swap Facility
|
RBI offers to exchange forex for rupees at a subsidized/concessional rate, absorbing part of the forward premium cost
|
|
Balance of Payments (BoP)
|
Systematic record of a country''s economic transactions with the rest of the world (Current + Capital Account)
|
Significance
- BoP stabilization tool: Encourages capital account inflows to offset current account pressures (trade deficit, capital outflows)
- Currency stability: Higher forex inflows support the rupee, reducing depreciation pressure
- Cost-effective for banks/corporates: Concessional rate lowers hedging costs, making forex borrowing/deposits more attractive
- Historical precedent: Similar to the 2013 FCNR(B) swap scheme (post-taper tantrum), which had mobilized around $34 billion — this facility has already surpassed that benchmark
- Reflects RBI''s proactive exchange rate management — using non-interventionist, incentive-based tools rather than direct forex market intervention alone
Way Forward / Analytical Points
- Sustained reliance on swap-based inflows should be viewed as a short-term stabilization measure, not a substitute for structural improvements in the current account .
- Should be assessed alongside broader reserve adequacy indicators (import cover, external debt-to-GDP)
|
CAPF (General administration) Act 2026
GS Paper II — Governance, Polity, Internal Security
Why in News?
Over 3,000 CAPF Group ''A'' officers — including gallantry award winners and women officers — have moved the Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of the CAPF (General Administration) Act, 2026, which they argue was enacted specifically to negate a final SC judgment in their favour.
About the Act
- Nodal Ministry: MHA
- CAPFs covered: BSF, CRPF, CISF, ITBP, SSB
- NOT covered: Assam Rifles, NSG
- Key case: Sanjay Prakash v. Union of India (23 May 2025)
- New status conferred: "Organised Group A Services (OGAS)"
- IPS quotas: IG-50%, ADG-67%, Spl.DG/DG-100%
CAPFs Covered
· BSF, CRPF, CISF, ITBP, SSB (Ministry of Home Affairs) Does NOT apply to: Assam Rifles, National Security Guard (NSG) — separate legal/administrative frameworks.
Objectives
- Uniform legal framework for recruitment, promotion, service conditions
- Legislative clarity replacing dispersed executive instructions
- Harmonize administration with judicial developments while preserving operational effectiveness.
Significance
Administrative : Common legal framework across CAPFs; reduces reliance on ad hoc executive instructions
Internal Security : Aims for uniformity in leadership/personnel management across forces guarding borders, internal security, VIP/asset protection
Governance : Shifts service conditions from dispersed executive rules to codified legislation — in principle, a positive administrative reform
Issues & Concerns
- Career Progression: CAPF cadre officers — many with decades of ground operational experience — face a shrinking path to top leadership
- Legislative Override of Judiciary: Central constitutional question — can Parliament pass a law specifically to nullify a final SC ruling by removing its legal basis, or does this cross into impermissible direct overruling?
- Morale & Parity: Long-standing IPS-generalist vs. CAPF-specialist debate resurfaces — questions of equity for officers who spend entire careers within one force
- Excessive Delegation: Section 4''s notification-based Schedule amendment power bypasses full parliamentary scrutiny for future changes
Government Justification
- Claims legislative clarity, administrative efficiency, preserved operational coordination, and reduced future litigation through a uniform statutory (rather than judicially-mandated) framework
Constitutional Doctrine at Stake
- Ultra vires: Whether Sections 3 & 4 exceed constitutional authority
- Legislature vs. Judiciary: Settled principle in Indian jurisprudence — Parliament can validly remove the legal foundation of a judgment (permissible), but cannot directly annul/overrule a court''s judgment (impermissible). This case will test which category the 2026 Act falls into.
Way Forward
- Periodic, transparent cadre reviews or judicial resolution to genuinely balance operational deputation needs with organic cadre career progression
- Institutional consensus-building between MHA and CAPF stakeholders rather than repeated legislative-judicial confrontation
|
Collegium Transparency
GS Paper II — Polity, Judiciary
Why in News?
SC Judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan flagged the Collegium''s lack of transparency in judicial appointments as a "loophole.
Collegium System
- Not mentioned in the Constitution — evolved through judicial pronouncements (Three Judges Cases)
- Comprises CJI + 4 senior-most SC judges (for SC appointments); HC Collegiums comprise CJ + 2 senior-most judges
- Recommends appointments/transfers of judges to SC and High Courts
Evolution — Three Judges Cases
|
Case
|
|
|
First Judges Case (1981)
|
Executive primacy in judicial appointments; CJI''s opinion not binding.
|
|
Second Judges Case (1993)
|
Collegium system established; judiciary gained primacy in appointments.
|
|
Third Judges Case (1998)
|
Collegium expanded to CJI + 4 senior-most Supreme Court judges.
|
Memorandum of Procedure (MoP)
- Document governing the process of judicial appointments between the Judiciary and Government
- Referenced by Justice Bhuyan as having "own limited disclosure" — even MoP doesn''t mandate full transparency
NJAC (National Judicial Appointments Commission)
- 99th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2014 sought to replace Collegium with NJAC
- Struck down in 2015 (Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. UoI) as violative of Basic Structure (judicial independence)
Transparency Concerns Raised
- Deliberations on judge elevation/transfer remain confidential
- Reasons for rejecting/deferring recommendations rarely disclosed
- No codified public criteria for selection
Key Precedent Cases Cited
- Swapnil Tripathi v. Supreme Court of India (2018) — Held that livestreaming of court proceedings is a facet of open justice; expands courtroom "beyond its physical four walls"
- CPIO, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal (2020) — Held CJI''s office comes under RTI Act; "judicial independence is not secured by secrecy of cloistered halls"
Significance
- Reinforces open justice and judicial accountability principles
- Highlights tension between judicial independence and transparency/accountability
- Links to broader RTI vs. institutional confidentiality debate (CJI office under RTI since 2019 SC ruling)
|
ETHANOL BLENDED PETROL (EBP) PROGRAMME / E20
GS Paper III — Energy Security, Agriculture, Environment.
Why in News?
E20 petrol (20% ethanol blending) has drawn renewed public attention over concerns on vehicle mileage, engine compatibility, and consumer choice, prompting clarifications from the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas
What is Ethanol?
- Ethyl alcohol — biofuel from fermentation of sugars (yeast) or petrochemical processes
- India''s primary feedstock: sugarcane molasses; increasingly maize, surplus rice, damaged foodgrains
Blending Terminology
- E10 = 10% ethanol (suitable for most vehicles)
- E20 = 20% ethanol (needs compatible engines, slight efficiency dip)
- RON (Research Octane Number): Petrol = 84.4 | E20 ≈ 108.5 → raises effective RON to ~95
About the EBP Programme
- Operates under National Biofuel Policy (NBP), 2018
- Nodal Ministry: Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas
- Oversight body: National Biofuel Coordination Committee (NBCC) — regulates feedstock use via surplus declarations
- E20 target achieved: 2025 (originally targeted for 2030)
- Mandatory E20 + minimum RON 95: effective April 2026
Significance / Impact
- Energy Security: Forex savings > ₹1.4 lakh crore since 2014; ethanol production capacity: <2 billion litres (2014) → ~20 billion litres
- Agrarian Impact: Farmers earned ₹1.18 lakh crore; distilleries ₹1.96 lakh crore (till 2025) — shift from "Annadata" to "Urjadata"
- Climate Action: E20 → ~832 lakh metric tonnes CO2 reduction; supports Panchamrit/Net-Zero by 2070 goal; E20 can cut lifecycle carbon emissions by ~40%
- Circular Economy: DDGS (Dried Distillers Grain with Solubles) — cattle feed byproduct from grain-based ethanol
Key Concerns (E20 Criticism)
- Mileage reduction: 3-5%
- Compatibility: Older (pre-E20) vehicles at risk
- Hygroscopic nature: Ethanol absorbs moisture → corrosion risk in rubber/metal parts
- No consumer choice at pumps (unlike Brazil''s multi-blend system)
- No clear price incentive: Ethanol taxed at 5% GST, petrol under Central Excise + State VAT — effectively similar consumer pricing
- Water use: 3-5 litres processed water/litre ethanol (though Zero Liquid Discharge systems used)
|
GSI New Director General
GS - I
Why in News: Varsha Ashok Aglawe has assumed charge as the 54th Director General of the Geological Survey of India (GSI), becoming the first woman to head the organisation in its 176-year history.
About GSI
- Founded in 1851, primarily to find coal deposits for railways.
- Functions under the Ministry of Mines.
- Headquarters: Kolkata.
- Key functions: geological mapping, mineral resource assessment, geo-hazard (landslide, earthquake) studies, and now critical mineral exploration.
Distinguish from similar bodies (common prelims trap)
- GSI (Geological Survey of India) — govt body, Ministry of Mines, est. 1851.
- Geological Society of India — Bengaluru-based scientific society, NOT a govt department.
- Indian Bureau of Mines (IBM) — also under Ministry of Mines; regulates mining, conservation of minerals; HQ Nagpur. (Relevant since Aglawe worked here before GSI.)
- Mineral Exploration and Consultancy Limited (MECL) — PSU under Ministry of Mines for mineral exploration.
- National Aluminium Company, Coal India etc. — PSUs, not to be confused with GSI''s regulatory/survey role.
Voluntary Drug Testing in IITs/IIMs
GS Paper II & IIIGovernance/Social Justice (Health Policy, Education) + Internal Security (Narcotics/NDPS)
Why in News: Central government has begun voluntary urine drug testing for incoming students at IITs, IIMs, and one central university (Phase 1), under Education Ministry guidelines.
Quick Facts Table
|
Item
|
Detail
|
|
Implementing Ministry
|
Ministry of Education (Department of Higher Education)
|
|
Guidelines framed by
|
National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre (NDDTC), AIIMS New Delhi
|
|
Nature of test
|
Voluntary, confidential, anonymised
|
|
Substances tested
|
Amphetamines, cocaine, marijuana, benzodiazepines, PCP
|
- Amphetamines → Synthetic stimulant; includes meth; made from ephedrine/pseudoephedrine (controlled precursors)
- Cocaine → Natural stimulant; from coca leaf (South America); not grown in India, only trafficked.
- Marijuana → Natural, from cannabis plant; 3 forms under NDPS — Ganja, Charas/Hashish, Bhang
- Benzodiazepines → Synthetic sedative; legal pharma drug (diazepam, alprazolam) diverted for misuse
- PCP → Synthetic dissociative hallucinogen; called "Angel Dust"; rare in India, more common abroad
Institutional Architecture for Drug Control:
- NCB (Narcotics Control Bureau) — enforcement, under MHA, coordinates NDPS Act implementation
- Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment — nodal ministry for drug demand reduction, runs Nasha Mukt Bharat Abhiyan
- AIIMS'' NDDTC — treatment/de-addiction guidelines (source of this article''s testing protocol)
- Central Bureau of Narcotics (CBN) — under Dept. of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, regulates licit opium cultivation (Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, UP are the only states with legal poppy cultivation licenses), HQ Gwalior
- DRI (Directorate of Revenue Intelligence) — customs-related drug seizures at ports/borders.

|
Kudremukh National Park
GS Paper I/III — Geography, Environment & Biodiversity
Location
- Tri-junction of Chikkamagaluru, Dakshina Kannada, Udupi districts, Karnataka
- Part of the Central Western Ghats
- Falls under Western Ghats Biodiversity Hotspot
- Recognised as Global Tiger Conservation Priority-I Landscape
Legal/Historical Timeline
|
Year
|
|
|
1916
|
Notified as Reserved Forest
|
|
1987
|
Declared National Park (after surveys highlighting Lion-tailed Macaque habitat)
|
- Historical name: Samseparvata
- Current name from Kudremukh Peak (1,894 m) — "Horse Face" (resembles a horse''s face)
- Kudremukh Peak = 2nd highest peak in Karnataka (after Mullayanagiri — highest)
- Area: 600.32 sq. km
- Altitude range: ~100 m to 1,894 m
Don''t confuse Mullayanagiri (highest peak, Karnataka) with Kudremukh (2nd highest) — a classic prelims swap question
Rivers Origin point: Gangamoola Hills (within the park)
Three major rivers originate here:
- Tunga
- Bhadra
- Netravathi
Flow direction:
- Tunga + Bhadra → flow eastwards → merge to form Tungabhadra → tributary of Krishna River
- Netravathi → flows westwards → drains into Arabian Sea
Other smaller rivers originating here: Gurupura, Swarna, Seethanadhi, Yenehole
Ecosystem Types
- Tropical wet evergreen forests
- Shola forests (montane forest-grassland mosaic — Western Ghats/Nilgiris specialty)
- Montane grasslands
- Moist deciduous forests
Biodiversity — Species to Remember
Flagship species: Lion-tailed Macaque — Kudremukh hosts the world''s largest contiguous population
Other mammals: Tiger, Leopard, Dhole (Asiatic wild dog), Gaur, Sloth Bear, Malabar Giant Squirrel, Sambar Deer.
Birds: ~200 species recorded; endemics include Malabar Trogon, Malabar Whistling Thrush, Imperial Pigeon
Wildlife Corridor Role: Connects Bhadra Tiger Reserve with Someshwara, Mookambika, Pushpagiri, Talacauvery, Brahmagiri, Nagarahole — facilitates elephant/tiger movement across the Western Ghats landscape.
|
Shipki La - Indo- china Border
GS-II: India–China Relations | GS-I: Indian Geography | GS-III: Border Infrastructure & Trade
Why in News?
India–China border trade through Shipki La Pass (Himachal Pradesh) resumed after a six-year suspension, reviving one of the traditional Himalayan trade routes between India and Tibet.
About Shipki La Pass
- Mountain pass located in Kinnaur district, Himachal Pradesh.
- Connects Kinnaur (India) with Tibet Autonomous Region (China).
- Situated in the Greater Himalayas.
- Sutlej River enters India near Shipki La after flowing from Tibet.
- Historically formed part of the Ancient Silk Route, facilitating trade between India and Tibet.
Recent Developments
- Border trade resumed after 6 years.
- 16 traders were flagged off from Himachal Pradesh.
- Trade continues through the traditional barter system.
- Chhuppan Trade Mart established at Namgya (Kinnaur) to facilitate border trade.
- State Government has proposed expanding the list of tradable commodities through the Ministry of External Affairs.

|
Zero FIR & BNS Sections — Ladakh Case
GS Paper IIPolity/Governance — Criminal Justice System.
Why in news ?
- Zero FIR registered by Ladakh Police against a social media influencer (Yogesh Parmar) over an allegedly objectionable video against the Union Home Minister
What is a Zero FIR ?
- A Zero FIR can be filed at any police station, irrespective of jurisdiction where the offence occurred
- It is registered with serial number "0", and later transferred to the police station with actual jurisdiction for investigation
- Purpose: Prevents delay in registering a complaint on grounds of jurisdiction.
- Introduced based on recommendations of the Justice Verma Committee (2013).
- Now formally codified under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 (Section 173).
BNS Sections Involved:
|
BNS Section
|
Provision
|
Old IPC Equivalent (approx.)
|
|
197(1)(d)
|
Acts endangering sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India
|
New provision (no direct IPC equivalent; expanded from Sec 124A sedition-adjacent provisions)
|
|
352
|
Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace
|
IPC Section 504
|
|
353(1)
|
Statements conducing to public mischief
|
IPC Section 505
|
Important Prelims Linkage: New Criminal Law Framework (2023)
Three new codes replaced colonial-era laws, effective 1 July 2024:
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 → replaced Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 → replaced Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973
- Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 → replaced Indian Evidence Act, 1872
|
Posted on 02-08-2026 • By Admin